emergent skeptic
i am so skeptical of the whole "emergent" thing. the very need to be reminded that "emergent" is not "emerging" before understanding the relationships in the current conversation seems to be a hefty entry fee into that conversation. add to that the sponsored "friends, cohorts, etc" along with the loudest voice syndrome on the web and you have a system ripe for becoming our next denomination - no different than the others out there, in the main.
i belive not only that the church will emerge into a culture that continues to shift into postmodernism (did we really think that modernism was the end of it all?...), but that it will emerge from the people that just "do church" in a way that is consistent with the way they are naturally informed by their core cultural understandings.
the last is mouthful saying that the leaders of a movement (self or otherwise proclaimed) are not nearly so important to the future of the church as the people who are just going about their business of being a christian.
i also recognize that my skepticism is not necessarily based on their hopes and plans. but i still believe they are headed down a dangerous road.



